<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechStat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techstat.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techstat.net</link>
	<description>Bringing the latest hardware news about Graphics Cards, CPUs and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 02:38:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Intel i7 4770k New features and is it worth the money? + owner reviews!</title>
		<link>http://www.techstat.net/intel-i7-4770k-new-features-and-is-it-worth-the-money-owner-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techstat.net/intel-i7-4770k-new-features-and-is-it-worth-the-money-owner-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 02:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>victor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CPUs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techstat.net/?p=483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nevertheless time for a brand new Tock cycle in Intel&#8217;s ticktock launch program for Intel Primary processors. The goods under codename Haswell are here, and although it&#8217;ll become a feisty chain of cpus we must confess, Moore&#8217;s legislation is definitely coming to a slow down. Haswell is a hint quicker over-the past generation, not [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nevertheless time for a brand new Tock cycle in Intel&#8217;s ticktock launch program for Intel Primary processors. The goods under codename Haswell are here, and although it&#8217;ll become a feisty chain of cpus we must confess, Moore&#8217;s legislation is definitely coming to a slow down. Haswell is a hint quicker over-the past generation, not heaps. Inserting more and more transistors into a die will further confuse issues. Next to that, the COMPUTER market is altering and Intel is adjusting to that. We see much smaller form-factor computers including from a HTPC, to a modest desktop PC to-the approaching detachable remedies and pills. And therefore, Intel&#8217;s focus was to create an buildings that to the pc side would make it-the fastest four core processors, yet also required to become more energy efficient and provide a faster graphics option for their cellular and tablet PC section. That endanger my buddies, is Haswell. Gradually but steadily cpus get more and more features embedded; images, chip, chipset features, memory controllers and today also current regulation. Therefore it&#8217;s safe to say that with Haswell, desktop cpus formally have become a SoC (system on a processor). For the platform there&#8217;ll be one point that describes Haswell finest, the Haswell design may really be a tiny step ahead in performance, a major step in IGP efficiency and-a (positive) step down in electricity usage, all are great points.</p>
<p>When measuring 3D gaming functionality with a high end graphics card again, the Core i7 &#8211; 4770K is just somewhat faster than the i7 &#8211; 3770K. </p>
<p>At the conclusion of the day-the Intel Core i7-4770K left us amazed. It has excellent improvements in regards to images and the PROCESSOR functionality increases are difficult to disregard. We cannot wait to-see on the side what Intel did while Haswell appears great on the background. It&#8217;s safe to state that Intel built Haswell with Thin and cellular platforms &#8211; ITX background clients in your mind. There must be some really fine battery life and functionality increases there too!</p>
<p>REVIEWS:</p>
<p>Pros: This processor is put by that at these speeds at #6 in cpus! Number five is the i7 3930k which offers for $569 and just scores 600 points higher-than the i7 4770k. All the others are Xeon server processors and extreme i7 variants all properly over $1000 cost range.</p>
<p>Disadvantages: As stated in my prior post is really not a great overclocker and gets warmer than most cpus.</p>
<p>Not worth updating if via the i7 3770k unless your choosing your new motherboard functions like 10 6Gb Sata ports.</p>
<p>Pros: This COMPUTER is reliable and very quick so far. Despite what other folks have been stating about overclocking I have had no difficulties. </p>
<p>Disadvantages: none yet</p>
<p>Pros : * Amazing clock for clock performance<br />
* Manner better-than my i7<br />
960 * Easy enough to obtain an overclock (whether you enjoy the velocity or not<br />
) * If you . buy are not likely to OC, excellent. Stock speed it is really one of-the fastest chips on the market</p>
<p>* Overclocking. Runs very hot, 1.25v pushing 85c with fluid cooling *Looks like nearly all folks are becoming a processor capable of just 4.4 GHz at manageable voltage<br />
*Extremely difficult to discover in the event the OC is secure, instead of BSOD it reaches for more voltage.</p>
<p>Additional Ideas: I arrived with an i7 960, which in-the latter weeks of it is time I had OC&#8217;d at 4.2 GHz. Entering the launch of Haswell, I believed that I had for certain be viewing at-least a 4.6 GHz overclock with rumours that had been handed around. At my 4.4 GHz OC, I certainly notice a tremendous efficiency in MMOs including GW2. I am now able to readily stream GW2 at 60 fps on maximum settings. It&#8217;s a great purchase, but also for the enthusiast not-so much.</p>
<p>Pros: Rapid and secure</p>
<p>Disadvantages: none</p>
<p>Additional Ideas: </p>
<p>950 to this Core i7 4770k. Understandably it&#8217;s apparently quicker. The cpus are quicker and have attributes likeTurbo and which make them more effcient. One reward is the better chipset meaning a motherboard too. I was happy to-see the memory structure remains exactly the same. For the very first time, I could upgrade to a brand new chip and never have to upgrade my storage. I place that cash into so some money was still made by the memory companies updating my SATA2 SSD to a SATA3 SSD. Pros: Excellent chip and quickly even at stock rates. </p>
<p>Disadvantages: Not a huge overclocker, produces lots of heat. Not worth updating if originating from an i7 3770k ivy bridge. Study other ideas for overclocking.</p>
<p>Other Ideas: My conditions at 4.5Ghz are 25-30c idle and 6065 below full load tension test with Prime95. Ordinary use like in games it rests around 40 50c which is fine.</p>
<p>Additionally I have hyperthreading disabled to obtain a constant 4.5Ghz because I do not do movie coding or whatever actually uses HT.</p>
<p>These are the times whenever you desire watercooling to get any sort of adequate OC and they&#8217;re just as simple to-install as-a stock PROCESSOR cooler fan only ensure that your case can match the version your considering.</p>
<p>z87 exceptional&#8230; 4770k&#8230; nothing truly fresh</p>
<p>- Overclocking headroom is excellent except one detail (other ideas)<br />
- Functionality is somewhat better than ivy in most instances (but really slightly)<br />
- Included Grid</p>
<p>2 Disadvantages : &#8211; Overclocking, although the headroom is there for probably great overclocks, good fortune maintaining it secure and awesome if you must surpass greater volts than<br />
1. 25 -T-Shirt I acquired was an XL&#8230; needed a M<br />
- wasn&#8217;t quite shinny</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.techstat.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  Additional Ideas: Overall, I&#8217;m pleased with my new arrangement (sold my 2500k assemble some weeks past, and simply now finding a brand new pc). The z87 chipset is what truly created me step-up from going forward with an ivy or sandy build. In real-world testing I haven&#8217;t seen above 65C yet, nevertheless in perfect&#8230; merely a matter-of seconds are needed to surpass 70C. Intel states not to use perfect, they need you to use Aida64. When using Aida, it might tell me my 4.6Ghz run was secure, I leap in a sport and BSOD, so I am adhering with perfect.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using a Corsair H80i to cool this hot head, also at the maximum speed of airflow, 5 minutes of perfect results in 77C (I despise 70C or more&#8230;). Cannot think this reduced current is to much for an H80 however.</p>
<p>My final word is if you&#8217;ve got Sandy or Ivy, and you are-an enthusiast, you might need to ramble away unless you intend to use the advantages of the z87 chipset. I had a lot more entertaining with my 2500k as far as overclocking. I&#8217;ve accepted the truth of heat which I might never manage to attain greater than 4.4ghz with this chip. The functionality continues to be leading as an i7 should be, and I really like having Sata 3 and all the 3 that the z87 supplies. So it is a goalkeeper for me.</p>
<p>PASSMARK RATING</p>
<p>= 13,157.9 </p>
<p>This may place my oc&#8217;ed 4770k in sixth on that graph.</p>
<p>ASSEMBLE:</p>
<p>- Asus z87-Plus</p>
<p>770<br />
1600 </p>
<p>Pros: I&#8217;m not certain about the other testers, but mine runs trendy and fine!<br />
I&#8217;ve purchased 2 preceding i5 systems which one tops all of them.</p>
<p>Disadvantages: None</p>
<p>Other Ideas: Also at stock speeds this COMPUTER is a noticeable improvement.</p>
<p>Perhaps the additional users are obtaining high temps because of awful thermal paste management? I study the warmth from haswell is nearly the centre of-the PROCESSOR vs older AMD,Intels. &#8220;Less is more&#8221;.<br />
I use the pea size approach that does not propagate to-the edges to realize my low temps on a CM Hyper</p>
<p>212. Pros: This issues is a creature, I finnaly decided it was time-to update my i7-920(new HTPC) and im happy i did. Incredible when compared with the aged 920. </p>
<p>Disadvantages: N/A</p>
<p>Pros: Uses less energy than SB, more strong IGP that I&#8217;ll not be using, and raised FPS in BF3.</p>
<p>Disadvantages: Not a remarkable change actually from Sandy Bridge. My system feels a small bit snaipper, so I will go. </p>
<p>Other Ideas: Mine appears to be staying with.904 volts. I went my 2600k at 4.0-4.2ghz but Haswell appears a tad snappier. Truthfully I just upgraded because I love the new Z87 Series boards. I travelled with-the MSI M Power. Like it. </p>
<p>Pros: Everything worked out-of the package. No problems whatsoever. PC (with SSD) boots to desk-top in less-than 15 seconds.</p>
<p>Disadvantages: None.</p>
<h4>coupon and promo code terms</h4><i> intel 4770 vs intel 3770 ,</i><p>No related posts.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techstat.net/intel-i7-4770k-new-features-and-is-it-worth-the-money-owner-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/14 queries in 0.004 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 589/606 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.techstat.net @ 2013-06-19 13:26:40 -->